Page check report
Send a live link. You see what each color tells your users, and what color-blind users actually see.
A PDF for the page: its mood, every contrast failure, and the fix for each one.
Text size
High contrast

Your color is costing you.
Something in your app looks off. You can't fix it without breaking something else.
Skip the six months of meetings. Take a 15-minute call. I'll show you where color is costing you money, and what to fix first.
Users pause before they click.
The main action looks like everything else, so they read instead of act.
The same question, every week.
Was that saved? Did it go through? Color was supposed to answer that.
The contrast check fails again.
Someone fixes one screen. The next release brings it back.
That pause costs you. It shows up in support tickets, and in deals that quietly don't close. I find where the color is broken. Then I fix it.
See it in your colorsEnter your colors. Get a Color Code read in two seconds. Nothing is saved.
Your order ships Thursday. Review the details before you pay.
Your body text is 2.5:1 on its background, below the 4.5:1 minimum, so a lot of people are squinting. The label on your primary button is only 3.3:1. Your most important word is the hardest to read. There are 4 more issues below.
Every number comes from the checks below.Body text is readable
2.5:1 on the background. WCAG AA needs 4.5:1.
Button label is readable
3.3:1 on the primary button. WCAG AA needs 4.5:1.
Links stand out
3.7:1 on the background. WCAG AA needs 4.5:1.
Action and success look different
Primary vs success differ by ΔE 9.8. Under 6 reads as the same color. 12 or more is clearly distinct.
Success and error survive color blindness
With deuteranopia (about 1 in 16 men), they differ by ΔE 7.4. Under 7 reads as the same color. 12 or more is clearly distinct.
Primary button signals the right intent
Reads as Done. The Color Code expects Trust or Belonging or Energy or Attention.
Success signals the right intent
Reads as Done. The Color Code expects Done or Growth.
Error signals the right intent
Reads as Alarm. The Color Code expects Alarm.
Your audit request will include these findings.
Move the sliders to match your product. The total updates as you go.
$451,560
a yearThat number doesn't go away on its own. The first call is free.
Book the free 15-min callAssumes 30% of tickets come from color and UI confusion, and a 1-point conversion lift. Most clients see 2 to 3 times that.
I show you where your color is costing you, and the one thing to fix first.
Book the callThe tool runs it. You get a branded PDF the same day.
Send a live link. You see what each color tells your users, and what color-blind users actually see.
A PDF for the page: its mood, every contrast failure, and the fix for each one.
Upload a design token file. You see how much of your palette backs the feeling you want, and the colors that work against it.
A PDF for the file: the mood of every color, the colors people see when they decide, and a suggested replacement for each one that needs work.
I do the work in your code. Priced per repository, because the work grows with the codebase.
Fixes the colors you already have. Slate-200 tells your team nothing, so I rename every color in your code for the job it does.
Renamed tokens in your repo, plus a before-and-after summary of your clarity rate.
Color changes how people feel at the moment they decide. I test your palette against your screens and your audience so users feel safe enough to act.
Palette mood reports for every token file, plus my review of what to change and why.
Your whole color system, done for you. I rename the colors you have, test your palette so users feel safe enough to act, then set up naming rules in your code so every new color follows them.
Fifteen minutes. Free. You leave knowing the one thing to fix first.